Fluid IT Blog | Latest information on Managed IT Services and solutions

Disaster Recovery Plans Need Annual Testing

Written by Clint Underwood | Feb 25, 2026 11:00:00 AM

Introduction

You have a disaster recovery plan. It's documented, approved, and filed away. But here's the problem: plans don't survive contact with reality. The only way to know your recovery procedures actually work is to test them under realistic conditions, not when disaster strikes.

The Planning Paradox

Recovery plans become outdated the moment they're written. Staff changes, systems migrate to the cloud, new applications launch, and procedures quietly become inaccurate. Without regular testing, you won't discover those gaps until you need the plan most—when minutes count and stress is high.

Different Tests for Different Purposes

A tabletop exercise where you talk through procedures is better than nothing, but it won't catch technical failures. Full-scale recovery tests that actually restore systems to secondary sites reveal real problems: authentication failures, incomplete data migrations, incompatible software versions, and coordination breakdowns between teams.

Effective Testing Strategy:

Annual Full Recovery Test: Restore all critical systems to verify procedures work.

Quarterly Tabletop Exercises: Review procedures and identify gaps without full restoration.

Document Everything: Track what failed, what worked, and what needs improvement.

Update Continuously: Revise plans immediately after testing, not months later.

Conclusion

A disaster recovery plan that hasn't been tested is just fiction. Real preparedness requires proving your procedures work before you're forced to execute them under pressure.